Farm Subsidy information
Pipestone County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 533
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $10,091,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Family Share Of Marlin E Arends Revocable Trust Da | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $10,568 |
102 | Cheney Lee Vander Top | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $10,538 |
103 | David L Veldhuizen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $10,480 |
104 | Carol Haubrich Revocable Trust | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $10,456 |
105 | Brian Kas | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $10,220 |
106 | Stoltzfus Farms LLC | Ward, SD 57026 | $9,948 |
107 | Donald Wilfrid Fritz | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,919 |
108 | Jeffrey Biever | Holland, MN 56139 | $9,794 |
109 | Mark Hiniker | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,761 |
110 | Tyler Evans | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,740 |
111 | Joel Minett-joel Minett Revocable Trust | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $9,684 |
112 | Seth Burke | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,664 |
113 | Dennis R Johnson | Tyler, MN 56178 | $9,621 |
114 | , | $9,555 | |
115 | Ridge Enterprises | Holland, MN 56139 | $9,515 |
116 | Kent Stueven | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,339 |
117 | Ryan Lee Vander Pol | Saint Charles, MO 63302 | $9,334 |
118 | Jeff Mulder | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $9,321 |
119 | Daniel Minet | Holland, MN 56139 | $9,305 |
120 | Bryan Francis | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $9,228 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”