Market Loss Assistance Program in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 974
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $11,203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rock River Ranch Inc | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $27,985 |
102 | Sluis Family Revocable Living Tru | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $27,893 |
103 | Ronald Pfantz | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $27,639 |
104 | Bernard Walhof | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $27,612 |
105 | Francis Bouman Jr | Holland, MN 56139 | $27,527 |
106 | David W Blom | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $27,478 |
107 | Michael V Reese | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $27,452 |
108 | Gary Greenhoff | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $27,296 |
109 | Arvin Schelhaas | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $27,204 |
110 | Van Essen & Sons Dairy Farm | Jasper, MN 56144 | $27,036 |
111 | T & R Farms | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,786 |
112 | Mike Vander Plaats | Ward, SD 57026 | $26,666 |
113 | Jasper Dairy | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $26,643 |
114 | Gerry Merrill | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,642 |
115 | K & M Enterprises | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,462 |
116 | Curt Hess | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,449 |
117 | Ridge Enterprises | Holland, MN 56139 | $26,427 |
118 | Steve Viland | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,337 |
119 | Roger C Vander Linden | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $26,323 |
120 | Ronald Raatz | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $26,064 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”