Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 528
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $21,816,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Heartland Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $662,290 |
2 | A & L Spronk Farms Inc | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $481,813 |
3 | Brinkmeyer Farms | Holland, MN 56139 | $425,132 |
4 | Michael Baustian | Jasper, MN 56144 | $410,286 |
5 | New Horizon Farms Llp | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $351,986 |
6 | Vis Family Farms | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $341,871 |
7 | Great Plains Family Farms Inc | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $324,675 |
8 | Dunn Farms Inc | Jasper, MN 56144 | $293,990 |
9 | Curtis J Johnson | Jasper, MN 56144 | $287,511 |
10 | Calvin Musch | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $258,306 |
11 | Twin Rock Family Farms Inc | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $227,378 |
12 | Jeffrey Duane Backer | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $226,404 |
13 | Uilk Farms Inc | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $223,852 |
14 | Cougar Run Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $216,798 |
15 | Pater Dairy, Inc. | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $206,945 |
16 | Mark D Stueven | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $201,789 |
17 | Cottonwood Angus Farms | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $184,935 |
18 | Shetek Farms Llp | Currie, MN 56123 | $179,519 |
19 | Ryan Weinkauf | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $173,943 |
20 | Newalta Dairy LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $167,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>