Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Polk County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 98
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Polk County, Minnesota totaled $642,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Sandness | Fertile, MN 56540 | $3,789 |
42 | Kelly Joann Bushelle | Rosemount, MN 55068 | $3,506 |
43 | Matthew M Albrecht | Fosston, MN 56542 | $3,429 |
44 | Steve Watne | Gully, MN 56646 | $3,210 |
45 | Richard Pletschett | Trail, MN 56684 | $2,985 |
46 | Bjorn Andrew Sorgaard | Fosston, MN 56542 | $2,843 |
47 | Daniel J Malone | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $2,805 |
48 | Andrew P Quam | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $2,534 |
49 | Jason L Horn | Gonvick, MN 56644 | $2,511 |
50 | Nicholas Ostenaa | Gully, MN 56646 | $2,489 |
51 | Albert J Plante | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $2,456 |
52 | , | $2,437 | |
53 | Davin Kristofor Swanson | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $2,404 |
54 | Marissa Alexandra Mcwilliam-donner | Winger, MN 56592 | $2,399 |
55 | Brian D Anderson | Trail, MN 56684 | $2,376 |
56 | Tristan P Sorenson | Lengby, MN 56651 | $2,314 |
57 | Sidney O Fjerstad | Fosston, MN 56542 | $2,291 |
58 | Ray Hovland | Fosston, MN 56542 | $2,269 |
59 | Rick Forsberg | Gully, MN 56646 | $2,213 |
60 | Blake Olson | Fosston, MN 56542 | $2,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”