Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Polk County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Polk County, Minnesota totaled $3,893,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larry Jagol | Fertile, MN 56540 | $784,773 |
| 2 | Bradley Jagol | Fertile, MN 56540 | $688,688 |
| 3 | Bauer Honey Inc | Fertile, MN 56540 | $632,764 |
| 4 | Woodside Honey LLC | Erskine, MN 56535 | $535,475 |
| 5 | Leiting Honey Inc. | Fertile, MN 56540 | $373,571 |
| 6 | Leiting Honey Inc | Fertile, MN 56540 | $286,392 |
| 7 | Justin Lee Benson | Fertile, MN 56540 | $51,208 |
| 8 | Erickson Farms | Fertile, MN 56540 | $31,796 |
| 9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $31,371 |
| 10 | El Rio Wishard | Trail, MN 56684 | $29,803 |
| 11 | Sogla Farms | Trail, MN 56684 | $23,651 |
| 12 | Crossroads Apiaries, LLC | Fertile, MN 56540 | $23,252 |
| 13 | Leiting Honey Pre-2012 Inc | Fertile, MN 56540 | $18,090 |
| 14 | Craig Sander | Fosston, MN 56542 | $17,232 |
| 15 | Erlandson Farms | Gully, MN 56646 | $16,940 |
| 16 | Jesse Haugen | Fosston, MN 56542 | $14,693 |
| 17 | Jeremy Bergerson | Gully, MN 56646 | $14,550 |
| 18 | Roger K Schmit | Gully, MN 56646 | $12,722 |
| 19 | Bar Double O Ranch | Bagley, MN 56621 | $12,456 |
| 20 | Jason M Breckel | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $11,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
