Farm Subsidy information
Red Lake County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 185
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $7,997,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael Bachand & Audrey Bachand Inc | Brooks, MN 56715 | $9,342 |
42 | Chad A Ste. Marie | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $9,189 |
43 | Kent J Turtle | Hendersonville, TN 37075 | $8,771 |
44 | Jackie Hesse | Elk River, MN 55330 | $8,600 |
45 | Roger R Hinrichs | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $8,558 |
46 | Jeanette Mcmullen | Plummer, MN 56748 | $8,120 |
47 | Emily Rae Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $8,004 |
48 | Pcb & Mdb Lllp | Oklee, MN 56742 | $7,850 |
49 | Raymond G Delorme | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,811 |
50 | , | $7,514 | |
51 | Connie Seibel | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,236 |
52 | Tom Seibel | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,236 |
53 | Ernest C Kolling | Brooks, MN 56715 | $6,807 |
54 | Lora J Johnson | Oklee, MN 56742 | $6,669 |
55 | Claire G Berberich | Brooks, MN 56715 | $6,667 |
56 | Timothy J Hoefer | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $6,355 |
57 | Nathan Whalen | Oklee, MN 56742 | $6,334 |
58 | Alan Elmer Lee | Plummer, MN 56748 | $5,966 |
59 | Susan M Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,963 |
60 | Jaime Richard Derosier | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”