Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 189
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $1,609,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terence Philip Funk | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $12,378 |
42 | E Duane Knott | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $12,133 |
43 | Matthew R Knott | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $12,133 |
44 | Leonard Huot | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $11,927 |
45 | Trinity Creek Ranch Inc | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $11,824 |
46 | Jaime Richard Derosier | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $11,569 |
47 | Caren L Swenson | Brooks, MN 56715 | $11,438 |
48 | Jeremiah O Johnson | Oklee, MN 56742 | $11,331 |
49 | Michael R Harmoning | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $11,254 |
50 | Timmy Kyle Bakken | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $11,109 |
51 | Bernard Elmer Steinkopf | Brooks, MN 56715 | $10,949 |
52 | Jeremy Joseph Huot | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $10,905 |
53 | Myron W Scheflo | Grafton, ND 58237 | $10,500 |
54 | Patrick E Wichterman | Plummer, MN 56748 | $10,385 |
55 | Gary W Novak | Saint Hilaire, MN 56754 | $10,257 |
56 | Arlene Novak | Saint Hilaire, MN 56754 | $10,257 |
57 | , | $9,474 | |
58 | James A Knott | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $9,331 |
59 | Curtis A Funk | Crookston, MN 56716 | $9,261 |
60 | Aaron Scott Myhre | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $9,072 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”