Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 196
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $1,102,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronald L Weiss | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,915 |
42 | Bernard Elmer Steinkopf | Brooks, MN 56715 | $7,831 |
43 | Knute N Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,825 |
44 | William J Paradis | Oklee, MN 56742 | $7,809 |
45 | Craig Linus Schmitz | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,517 |
46 | Todd Joseph Brule | Crookston, MN 56716 | $7,428 |
47 | Bradford L Barth | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $7,396 |
48 | Lyndon S Schultz | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,032 |
49 | Garrett J Novak | Saint Hilaire, MN 56754 | $7,015 |
50 | Richard D Schmitz | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $6,807 |
51 | Nickolas Knute Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $6,684 |
52 | Schmitz Family Farm LLC | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $6,552 |
53 | Matthew Joseph Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $6,516 |
54 | Steven L Linder | Oklee, MN 56742 | $6,500 |
55 | Pribyl Hay And Straw, Llp | Plummer, MN 56748 | $6,184 |
56 | Luke Jon Forness | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,986 |
57 | Mark Hagl | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,976 |
58 | Nathan Whalen | Oklee, MN 56742 | $5,886 |
59 | Emily Rae Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,822 |
60 | Beyer Brothers | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”