Farm Subsidy information
Red Lake County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 185
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $7,997,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Vernon L Konickson | Plummer, MN 56748 | $893 |
142 | Bachton Enterprises Inc | Brooks, MN 56715 | $869 |
143 | Steve E Seeger | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $831 |
144 | Tyrone Olson | Oklee, MN 56742 | $821 |
145 | Russell Wade Thorpe | Trail, MN 56684 | $793 |
146 | Jordan Hoefer | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $775 |
147 | Don Delorme Residence Trust | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $723 |
148 | Beyer Brothers | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $677 |
149 | Brian R Schafer | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $674 |
150 | The Miller Group | Wahpeton, ND 58074 | $608 |
151 | Donald Hagen | Plummer, MN 56748 | $584 |
152 | Michael J Seeger | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $579 |
153 | Luke Jon Forness | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $571 |
154 | Delane John Dudycha | Plummer, MN 56748 | $565 |
155 | Jesse T Bushelle | Plummer, MN 56748 | $505 |
156 | Michael - Mjh Living Trust - J Hagl | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $504 |
157 | Rj Huot Farms LLC | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $501 |
158 | Neil Beyer | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $483 |
159 | , | $476 | |
160 | Thomas Schmitz | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”