Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 216
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $13,939,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Benjamin Linder | Oklee, MN 56742 | $8,210 |
162 | Scott Patrick Mcmullen | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $8,126 |
163 | Larry D Fossum | Trail, MN 56684 | $7,998 |
164 | Jay David Knott | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $7,904 |
165 | Kyle Proulx | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,800 |
166 | Vern Bregier | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,655 |
167 | Richard D Grandbois | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $7,610 |
168 | Tyrone Olson | Oklee, MN 56742 | $7,096 |
169 | Louis H Schultz Jr | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,743 |
170 | Dwight Robidoux | Juneau, AK 99803 | $5,453 |
171 | Ethan Daniel Klasen | Oklee, MN 56742 | $5,411 |
172 | Philip R Knott | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,340 |
173 | John P Stich | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,013 |
174 | Diana Stich | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,011 |
175 | Dean M Hesse | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $4,791 |
176 | David L Eskeli | Plummer, MN 56748 | $4,379 |
177 | Fred Sorensen Jr | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $4,281 |
178 | Daniel T Burman | Trail, MN 56684 | $4,272 |
179 | Kyle Kenneth Proulx | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $3,978 |
180 | Peter L Stich | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $3,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”