Total Conservation Programs in Redwood County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 913
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Redwood County, Minnesota totaled $3,726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dennis A Hemish | Walnut Grove, MN 56180 | $13,592 |
82 | Michael D Petersen | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $13,461 |
83 | Mr Ricky D Petersen | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $13,461 |
84 | Lee Kent French | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $13,396 |
85 | Cory Wenisch | Springfield, MN 56087 | $13,032 |
86 | Roger Pfarr | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $12,677 |
87 | Jared L Amberg | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $12,344 |
88 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $12,261 |
89 | Striepe Doeden Farms | Omaha, NE 68116 | $12,121 |
90 | Gwl Farms Inc | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $12,033 |
91 | Willard Pfarr | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $11,298 |
92 | Steven D Geis | Woodbury, MN 55129 | $10,827 |
93 | Lowell E Gryting Trust Number One | Plymouth, MN 55441 | $10,730 |
94 | R A Christensen Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $10,708 |
95 | Charles W Nelson | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $10,696 |
96 | James W Timm | Wabasso, MN 56293 | $10,359 |
97 | Jeremy Krause | Vesta, MN 56292 | $10,056 |
98 | Darla D Wille Revocable Living Trust | Tracy, MN 56175 | $9,989 |
99 | William Jon Vogel | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $9,955 |
100 | Emilie J Kuehn | Faribault, MN 55021 | $9,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”