Total Conservation Programs in Redwood County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 913
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Redwood County, Minnesota totaled $3,726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Eric And Nisa Rachie Farms Llp | Crossville, TN 38558 | $8,852 |
122 | Brian B Johnson | Walnut Grove, MN 56180 | $8,730 |
123 | Lower Sioux Indian Community | Morton, MN 56270 | $8,723 |
124 | Neitzel Farms Inc | Morton, MN 56270 | $8,706 |
125 | D & J Dolan Farms LLC | Vesta, MN 56292 | $8,694 |
126 | Mary Segal | Clinton, OK 73601 | $8,509 |
127 | Ruth Churchill | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $8,468 |
128 | Marlys Pemble | Walnut Grove, MN 56180 | $8,467 |
129 | Daniel M Henriksen | Vesta, MN 56292 | $8,308 |
130 | Mgt Company | Windom, MN 56101 | $8,293 |
131 | Marvin A Preuss | Belview, MN 56214 | $8,200 |
132 | Paul H Milbradt | Belview, MN 56214 | $8,148 |
133 | Timothy Johanneck | Wabasso, MN 56293 | $8,132 |
134 | Pm Farms LLC | Belview, MN 56214 | $8,011 |
135 | R A Peterson Family Farms Llp | Marshall, MN 56258 | $8,003 |
136 | Todd Evans | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $7,985 |
137 | Michael J Baune | Vesta, MN 56292 | $7,844 |
138 | Joan Weicherding | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,778 |
139 | Leroy Pedersen | Renville, MN 56284 | $7,683 |
140 | Hofmann Family Farm Account | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $7,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”