Conservation Reserve Program in Renville County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,914
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Renville County, Minnesota totaled $53,077,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ladd M Ginsburg | Hector, MN 55342 | $262,846 |
22 | Duininck Companies LLC | Prinsburg, MN 56281 | $262,789 |
23 | Dean M Dambroten | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $257,905 |
24 | Allan Rosaasen | Renville, MN 56284 | $257,013 |
25 | Dana Ginsburg | Hector, MN 55342 | $251,536 |
26 | Bethel J Anderson | Gayville, SD 57031 | $246,126 |
27 | Daniel J Trochlil | Danube, MN 56230 | $245,558 |
28 | Peterson Family Farms Of Sacred Heart Lp | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $242,230 |
29 | Gary Lee | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $234,616 |
30 | Gerald Leland Holien | Maynard, MN 56260 | $229,538 |
31 | Round Grove LLC | Saint Paul, MN 55104 | $227,120 |
32 | River Living Trust | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $215,007 |
33 | Richard D Fredrickson | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $211,107 |
34 | Kathryn K Kelly | Olivia, MN 56277 | $210,918 |
35 | Marcia Lee | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $204,364 |
36 | Charles W Eginton | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $200,740 |
37 | Wade V Gronau | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $195,747 |
38 | William D Zaske | Renville, MN 56284 | $188,974 |
39 | Donavon M Vander Voort | Hector, MN 55342 | $187,003 |
40 | Simmons Valley Trust | Morton, MN 56270 | $181,196 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”