Farm Subsidy information
Renville County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Renville County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,451
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Renville County, Minnesota totaled $44,436,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Delfin Wulkan | Hector, MN 55342 | $133,707 |
42 | Kolyn J Prodoehl | Renville, MN 56284 | $133,635 |
43 | Homan Family Farms Inc | Hector, MN 55342 | $131,290 |
44 | Birch Cooley Farms Inc | Franklin, MN 55333 | $126,852 |
45 | Johnson Farms Of Hector | Hutchinson, MN 55350 | $125,478 |
46 | Mor Pork Inc | Redwood Falls, MN 56283 | $123,750 |
47 | Mr Randy Joel Buboltz | Hector, MN 55342 | $123,729 |
48 | Pabroma Inc | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $123,583 |
49 | Bruns Farms Inc | Renville, MN 56284 | $122,910 |
50 | Timothy R Swanson | Renville, MN 56284 | $121,699 |
51 | Tisdell Ag Partnership | Olivia, MN 56277 | $121,654 |
52 | Eloid O Penke | Danube, MN 56230 | $120,864 |
53 | Rik Rudeen | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $120,080 |
54 | Revier Farms Partnership | Olivia, MN 56277 | $119,427 |
55 | Erik G Dean | Hector, MN 55342 | $119,303 |
56 | Kopel Farms Inc | Danube, MN 56230 | $117,911 |
57 | Steffel Farms Partnership | Olivia, MN 56277 | $116,708 |
58 | Allan Merkel | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $116,196 |
59 | Watson Partners | Renville, MN 56284 | $116,117 |
60 | Cory A Hebrink | Renville, MN 56284 | $112,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”