Farm Subsidy information
Renville County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Renville County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,937
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Renville County, Minnesota totaled $790,015,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | J & C Swine LLC | Renville, MN 56284 | $1,340,018 |
62 | Revier Farms Partnership | Olivia, MN 56277 | $1,320,127 |
63 | Ridl Farms Inc | Renville, MN 56284 | $1,312,014 |
64 | Terry Ahlbrecht | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,311,260 |
65 | Cjw Farms | Renville, MN 56284 | $1,310,737 |
66 | Triple F Farms Llp | Olivia, MN 56277 | $1,304,114 |
67 | Keith J Mcnamara | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $1,301,379 |
68 | Michael S Melberg | Buffalo Lake, MN 55314 | $1,295,428 |
69 | Mcnamara Farms Inc | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $1,288,735 |
70 | Mark Melberg | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,284,607 |
71 | Prime Ridge Beef LLC | Springfield, MN 56087 | $1,259,091 |
72 | Ronald A Mellies | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,252,548 |
73 | Jeffrey Buboltz | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,240,954 |
74 | Christopher Black | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $1,235,285 |
75 | G E Johnson Inc | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,232,240 |
76 | Myron L Macik | Hector, MN 55342 | $1,221,792 |
77 | Brad Melberg | Cosmos, MN 56228 | $1,207,489 |
78 | John Hilgert | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $1,203,496 |
79 | Dean Ole Enestvedt | Sacred Heart, MN 56285 | $1,187,636 |
80 | Brian Schmidt | Renville, MN 56284 | $1,182,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”