Conservation Reserve Program in Rock County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 228
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Rock County, Minnesota totaled $1,108,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jamie B Pap | Luverne, MN 56156 | $2,089 |
102 | Robert T Valleau Irrevocable Family Trust | Windom, MN 56101 | $2,082 |
103 | Erickson Farm Inc | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $2,074 |
104 | Horace Thompson Inc | Windom, MN 56101 | $2,056 |
105 | Ronald Boyenga-ronald Boyenga Rev Living Trust | Ellsworth, MN 56129 | $1,885 |
106 | Lass Family Farms Inc. | Luverne, MN 56156 | $1,870 |
107 | Cal Lubben | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $1,863 |
108 | Kevin Rozeboom | Luverne, MN 56156 | $1,843 |
109 | Jeffrey B Kindt | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $1,821 |
110 | Mavis Steinhauer | Rochester, MN 55901 | $1,821 |
111 | Rodney Kindt | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $1,821 |
112 | Linda Kontz | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $1,821 |
113 | Don Bork-don R Bork Living Trust | Beaver Creek, MN 56116 | $1,809 |
114 | Leroy Veldkamp | Jasper, MN 56144 | $1,801 |
115 | Kermit Limesand | Luverne, MN 56156 | $1,788 |
116 | Terry Sandstede | Steen, MN 56173 | $1,718 |
117 | Roger Brockberg | Hardwick, MN 56134 | $1,707 |
118 | Paul Tweet | Kenneth, MN 56147 | $1,681 |
119 | Todd Matus | Beaver Creek, MN 56116 | $1,635 |
120 | Gary Erdmann | Balaton, MN 56115 | $1,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”