Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Rock County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 246
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Rock County, Minnesota totaled $6,184,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Idlenot Farms Gp | Larchwood, IA 51241 | $10,909 |
142 | Dalton Gath | Luverne, MN 56156 | $10,699 |
143 | Stetson Gath | Luverne, MN 56156 | $10,699 |
144 | Ken Bos | Hills, MN 56138 | $10,534 |
145 | Ron Bos | Hills, MN 56138 | $10,528 |
146 | Horace Thompson Inc | Windom, MN 56101 | $10,517 |
147 | Roger Beers | Luverne, MN 56156 | $10,507 |
148 | Keith Borman | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $10,158 |
149 | Aaron Sandbulte | Kenneth, MN 56147 | $10,088 |
150 | Jeremy S Mulder | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $9,572 |
151 | Randy Mulder | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $9,572 |
152 | Terry Aukes | Larchwood, IA 51241 | $9,432 |
153 | Tim Baker | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $9,429 |
154 | Clair Crawford | Beaver Creek, MN 56116 | $9,052 |
155 | Mark S Thompson | Windom, MN 56101 | $9,017 |
156 | Jason William Fick | Luverne, MN 56156 | $9,015 |
157 | Professional Ag Marketing Inc | Luverne, MN 56156 | $8,926 |
158 | Pollei Revocable Trust | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $8,797 |
159 | Stanley Schouwenburg | Hills, MN 56138 | $8,747 |
160 | Jared L Pap | Luverne, MN 56156 | $8,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”