Farm Subsidy information
Roseau County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Roseau County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 710
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roseau County, Minnesota totaled $40,101,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kevin James Langaas | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $141,915 |
42 | Heggedal Farms LLC | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $141,758 |
43 | Vern Donovan Langaas | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $138,002 |
44 | Novacek Farms Ptshp | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $134,841 |
45 | Steven Harder | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $130,518 |
46 | Gregory Lislegard | Roseau, MN 56751 | $128,054 |
47 | Carter Gus Diesen | Wannaska, MN 56761 | $127,350 |
48 | Edward Walsh | Badger, MN 56714 | $121,748 |
49 | Richard Sikorski | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $121,535 |
50 | James Robert Kukowski | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $118,956 |
51 | Marilyn Dawn Kukowski | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $115,428 |
52 | Mark Foldesi | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $114,985 |
53 | Steven W Lee Farms Inc | Badger, MN 56714 | $114,395 |
54 | Deven Efta | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $113,134 |
55 | Solberg Farms Inc | Badger, MN 56714 | $111,354 |
56 | , | $110,633 | |
57 | Johnathan L Quamme | Wannaska, MN 56761 | $106,014 |
58 | , | $105,498 | |
59 | Timothy L Gust | Badger, MN 56714 | $103,014 |
60 | Brent Haugen | Badger, MN 56714 | $102,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”