Farm Subsidy information
Roseau County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Roseau County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 710
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roseau County, Minnesota totaled $40,101,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Arlan Clinton Dalager | Plymouth, MN 55447 | $71,571 |
82 | Brach Svoboda | Badger, MN 56714 | $71,387 |
83 | Donald R Melby | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $69,682 |
84 | Daniel Dostal | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $69,610 |
85 | Alton Aamodt | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $68,819 |
86 | Stuart Duwayne Rice | Roseau, MN 56751 | $67,016 |
87 | Warren Lovejoy | Warroad, MN 56763 | $65,071 |
88 | Isaac B Erickson | Badger, MN 56714 | $64,361 |
89 | Hunter Chad Spina | Roseau, MN 56751 | $63,115 |
90 | Parker Kvien | Roseau, MN 56751 | $62,936 |
91 | Luke Novacek | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $58,757 |
92 | Efrem Novacek | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $58,380 |
93 | Jan Miller | Roseau, MN 56751 | $58,370 |
94 | Hontvet Farms LLC | Warroad, MN 56763 | $58,196 |
95 | South 89 Farms Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $57,689 |
96 | Andrew L Gryskiewicz | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $55,284 |
97 | Allen R Stauffenecker | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $54,897 |
98 | Stuart B Eeg | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $53,930 |
99 | Levi Michael Novacek | Roseau, MN 56751 | $53,415 |
100 | Jason L Smith | Badger, MN 56714 | $53,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”