Farm Subsidy information
Roseau County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Roseau County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,251
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roseau County, Minnesota totaled $574,837,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Juhl Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,633,461 |
22 | Sikorski Bros | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $1,614,226 |
23 | Drewry T Parsley | Warroad, MN 56763 | $1,589,137 |
24 | Juhl Farms Jv | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,503,983 |
25 | Allen Aamodt | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,500,568 |
26 | Douglas Clare Erickson | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,467,153 |
27 | Habstritt Farms Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,435,437 |
28 | Shane Gary Kilen | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,411,519 |
29 | James Robert Kukowski | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $1,409,645 |
30 | Dunham Ag Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,348,166 |
31 | Kraig L Lee | Wannaska, MN 56761 | $1,343,711 |
32 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $1,335,503 |
33 | Eeg Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,313,910 |
34 | Vern Donovan Langaas | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,306,347 |
35 | Michael E Grahn | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,280,826 |
36 | David Vernon Dahlgren | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,233,525 |
37 | Ardell Ellsworth Magnusson | Roseau, MN 56751 | $1,218,866 |
38 | Mark Stephens | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $1,208,887 |
39 | Brent Haugen | Badger, MN 56714 | $1,160,087 |
40 | Richard Sikorski | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $1,158,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”