Farm Subsidy information
Roseau County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Roseau County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 952
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roseau County, Minnesota totaled $33,815,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waage Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $1,016,691 |
| 2 | Magnusson Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $545,466 |
| 3 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $490,156 |
| 4 | Blawat Farms Ptr | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $412,260 |
| 5 | D & K Farms Inc | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $354,845 |
| 6 | Kuznia General Partnership | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $331,991 |
| 7 | Juhl Farms Jv | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $299,734 |
| 8 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $293,204 |
| 9 | Wilmer Farms Inc | Warroad, MN 56763 | $276,154 |
| 10 | Trangsrud Svoboda Ptnship | Badger, MN 56714 | $252,359 |
| 11 | Millner Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $250,284 |
| 12 | South 89 Farms Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $245,618 |
| 13 | Isane Farms Inc | Badger, MN 56714 | $245,218 |
| 14 | Allen R Stauffenecker | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $234,653 |
| 15 | Howell Farms Inc | Badger, MN 56714 | $228,977 |
| 16 | Cb Farms LLC | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $227,918 |
| 17 | Green Acres Dairy | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $226,337 |
| 18 | Gnl Farms LLC | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $222,539 |
| 19 | Dunham Ag Inc | Roseau, MN 56751 | $222,263 |
| 20 | Mark William Melby | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $221,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf