Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Saint Louis County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 85
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Louis County, Minnesota totaled $87,464 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Warren Johnson | Ely, MN 55731 | $585 |
42 | Dale Skinner | Mountain Iron, MN 55768 | $579 |
43 | Robert Christopherson | Gilbert, MN 55741 | $565 |
44 | Dale Engdahl | Chisholm, MN 55719 | $552 |
45 | Warren Pulford | Mountain Iron, MN 55768 | $501 |
46 | Craig Augustin | Britt, MN 55710 | $495 |
47 | Jerome Vitse | Rochester, MN 55906 | $488 |
48 | Kenneth Schlueter | Babbitt, MN 55706 | $483 |
49 | Jim L Sowers | Hoyt Lakes, MN 55750 | $466 |
50 | Mark Hraban | Orr, MN 55771 | $454 |
51 | Joe Zlonis | Hibbing, MN 55746 | $432 |
52 | James Talus | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $430 |
53 | Chris Scofield | International Falls, MN 56649 | $430 |
54 | Jon Matala | Bloomington, MN 55431 | $421 |
55 | Michael L Hanson | Cook, MN 55723 | $413 |
56 | Terry Geiselman | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $398 |
57 | Anne S Pyhala | Tower, MN 55790 | $348 |
58 | Arthur Eggen | Crane Lake, MN 55725 | $344 |
59 | Steve Briski | Hibbing, MN 55746 | $342 |
60 | Roger Wical | Hot Springs, SD 57747 | $335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”