Total Emergency Relief Program in Scott County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 40
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Scott County, Minnesota totaled $243,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeffrey L Pieper | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $5,559 |
22 | H & H Farm | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $5,326 |
23 | David Efta | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $5,257 |
24 | Renee M Hentges | Jordan, MN 55352 | $5,063 |
25 | Clayton L Thomas | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $5,009 |
26 | Allen D Menke | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,912 |
27 | David M Stemig | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,796 |
28 | Francis J Shimota | Webster, MN 55088 | $4,592 |
29 | Matthew Thomas | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $4,559 |
30 | Nathan N Heinz | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $4,403 |
31 | John J Puncochar | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,172 |
32 | Jeffrey A Schalwig | Elko, MN 55020 | $3,902 |
33 | Bruce Friedges | Elko, MN 55020 | $3,830 |
34 | John Weckman | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $3,741 |
35 | John Scheffler | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $3,716 |
36 | Joseph Henry | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $2,506 |
37 | Jon Dvorak | Jordan, MN 55352 | $2,363 |
38 | Mark Scheffler | New Prague, MN 56071 | $2,042 |
39 | Douglas Andrew Kes | Jordan, MN 55352 | $2,011 |
40 | Nathan A Henry | New Prague, MN 56071 | $1,938 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous