Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Scott County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 174
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Scott County, Minnesota totaled $1,858,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenneth Pomije | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $8,487 |
62 | Mitchell M Kohout | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $8,171 |
63 | Richard A Pauly | Jordan, MN 55352 | $8,166 |
64 | John A Schmitz | New Prague, MN 56071 | $8,019 |
65 | Robert M Busacker | Jordan, MN 55352 | $8,015 |
66 | Steven O Schultz | Webster, MN 55088 | $7,974 |
67 | Michael Roach | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $7,594 |
68 | Robert Nytes | New Prague, MN 56071 | $7,581 |
69 | Tony Kornder | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $7,549 |
70 | Carole Busse | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $7,506 |
71 | David Minar | New Prague, MN 56071 | $7,344 |
72 | Matthew Thomas | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $7,274 |
73 | David F Theis | Jordan, MN 55352 | $7,040 |
74 | John Weckman | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $7,031 |
75 | John A Preisen | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $6,893 |
76 | Roger Dubbe | Jordan, MN 55352 | $6,626 |
77 | Stephan M Schalwig | Elko, MN 55020 | $6,499 |
78 | Hentges Ag Inc | Jordan, MN 55352 | $6,403 |
79 | Wallace Bischof | Cologne, MN 55322 | $6,269 |
80 | Norman Sticha | Elko, MN 55020 | $5,699 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”