Market Gains in Scott County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 108
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Scott County, Minnesota totaled $2,200,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | R & R Farms | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,376 |
62 | Merrill Hennen | Elko, MN 55020 | $4,355 |
63 | Robert J Seykora | Elko, MN 55020 | $4,283 |
64 | Dorothy Woestehoff Est | Henderson, MN 56044 | $4,236 |
65 | Schwartz Family Farms Inc | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,176 |
66 | Lyle Muehlenhardt | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,056 |
67 | John Preisen Jr | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $4,045 |
68 | Paul Plooster | Jordan, MN 55352 | $3,815 |
69 | Richard J Koenig | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $3,790 |
70 | Orville Schultz | Webster, MN 55088 | $3,741 |
71 | Duane E Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $3,647 |
72 | John Meierbachtol | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $3,596 |
73 | Gerald H Nagel | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $3,577 |
74 | Donald Meierbachtol | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $3,491 |
75 | Kenneth Schmitt | Milltown, WI 54858 | $3,446 |
76 | Richard Krentz | Henderson, MN 56044 | $3,124 |
77 | Thomas Walerius | Plymouth, MN 55447 | $2,856 |
78 | Martin Huss | Jordan, MN 55352 | $2,690 |
79 | Marty Beckius | Jordan, MN 55352 | $2,680 |
80 | Ronald Kroyer | Jordan, MN 55352 | $2,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”