Total Disaster Programs in Scott County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 372
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Scott County, Minnesota totaled $3,998,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mark G Wolf | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,861 |
142 | Leroy Schwartz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,805 |
143 | Roger Weiers | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,788 |
144 | Luella Pauly Estate | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,721 |
145 | Jon Dvorak | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,703 |
146 | Anthony Simek | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,674 |
147 | John M Geis | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,641 |
148 | Alan Novotny | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,625 |
149 | Matthew Thomas | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $4,559 |
150 | Leo Lenzmeier | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $4,547 |
151 | James Laabs | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,502 |
152 | Gary Steinhagen | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,424 |
153 | Nathan N Heinz | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $4,403 |
154 | Robert T Raleigh | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,231 |
155 | Richard Francis Marschall | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $4,206 |
156 | David O'brien | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,182 |
157 | John J Puncochar | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,172 |
158 | Richard A Pauly | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,171 |
159 | Robling Farm Inc | Jordan, MN 55352 | $4,152 |
160 | Elmer J Bartusek | Webster, MN 55088 | $4,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”