Market Gains in Scott County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 108
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Scott County, Minnesota totaled $2,200,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale R Tesch | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $12,832 |
42 | Larry Malz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $12,630 |
43 | Leslie A Quatmann | Jordan, MN 55352 | $11,669 |
44 | Duane J Flaschenriem | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $10,478 |
45 | Brian Entinger | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $8,420 |
46 | Albert Feldman | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $8,395 |
47 | Ivan Lehnert | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $7,950 |
48 | Duane J Deutsch | Jordan, MN 55352 | $7,170 |
49 | Daniel W Malz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $7,109 |
50 | Larry Theis | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $6,566 |
51 | Ira Beckman | Jordan, MN 55352 | $6,215 |
52 | Steven R Latzke | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $6,088 |
53 | Walerion B Plonski | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $5,907 |
54 | Richard Francis Marschall | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $5,770 |
55 | Thomas Koskovich | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $5,644 |
56 | James M Prokes | New Prague, MN 56071 | $5,509 |
57 | Ewald Gruetzmacher | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,925 |
58 | Kenneth Malz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,731 |
59 | Michael Leo Weinandt | New Prague, MN 56071 | $4,421 |
60 | Jeanne M Plonski | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $4,403 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”