Farm Subsidy information
Sherburne County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Sherburne County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sherburne County, Minnesota totaled $3,933,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bradley J Dillon | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $21,615 |
22 | Joshua Patrick Pramann | Clearwater, MN 55320 | $21,437 |
23 | Bonnie Marie Moeller | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $19,894 |
24 | Brian C Sanford | Princeton, MN 55371 | $19,892 |
25 | Manthei Hog Farm LLC | Elk River, MN 55330 | $16,956 |
26 | Aaron Peterson Farm Inc | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $16,358 |
27 | Gary R Hamner | Becker, MN 55308 | $16,260 |
28 | Eric J Vahling | Princeton, MN 55371 | $15,786 |
29 | Judy Ann Weis | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $15,734 |
30 | Olidola Farms Inc | Becker, MN 55308 | $15,419 |
31 | Brent D Gilyard | Oak Park, MN 56357 | $15,329 |
32 | Kozak Farms, LLC | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $14,407 |
33 | Severin H Peterson | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $13,061 |
34 | Revocable Trust Of Bert A Noterma | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $13,061 |
35 | Elk River Greenhouse LLC | Elk River, MN 55330 | $12,622 |
36 | Kampa Farms Lllp | Becker, MN 55308 | $12,158 |
37 | Joann A Lawrence | Coon Rapids, MN 55448 | $11,434 |
38 | Stephen M Czech | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $8,024 |
39 | Wanda V Mitsch | Loretto, MN 55357 | $7,971 |
40 | Scott J Ulsby | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $7,528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”