Counter Cyclical Program in Sherburne County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 294
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sherburne County, Minnesota totaled $2,064,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marcia Marie Anderson | Becker, MN 55308 | $8,080 |
62 | Brad Anderson Farm Limited Prt | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,786 |
63 | Neal G Weis | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $7,319 |
64 | Leroy Toth | Elk River, MN 55330 | $7,192 |
65 | Eugene E Smith | Maple Lake, MN 55358 | $7,190 |
66 | John David Beck | Walnut Grove, MN 56180 | $7,182 |
67 | Erickson Farms | Becker, MN 55308 | $7,139 |
68 | Gary R Hamner | Becker, MN 55308 | $7,051 |
69 | Peterson And Peterson Farms Llp | Becker, MN 55308 | $7,046 |
70 | Roger E Smith | Rochester, MN 55901 | $7,045 |
71 | Joel R Goergen | Maple Grove, MN 55311 | $6,842 |
72 | Stephen J Petersen | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $6,807 |
73 | David J Clement | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $6,736 |
74 | Roger L Erickson | Becker, MN 55308 | $6,702 |
75 | Ronald J Kolbinger | Becker, MN 55308 | $6,358 |
76 | Marvin C Swanson | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $6,095 |
77 | Glen S Wipper | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $6,054 |
78 | Richard K Thompson | Elk River, MN 55330 | $6,042 |
79 | Douglas P Lawrence | Coon Rapids, MN 55448 | $5,958 |
80 | Joseph Phillip Goenner | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $5,935 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”