Counter Cyclical Program in Sherburne County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 294
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sherburne County, Minnesota totaled $2,064,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Lewis R Stark | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $5,801 |
82 | Richard & Michael Goenner | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $5,390 |
83 | Richard P Hoffer | Elk River, MN 55330 | $5,299 |
84 | Lawrence Joseph Goenner | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $5,039 |
85 | Stephen M Czech | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $4,895 |
86 | Larry S Seeley | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $4,867 |
87 | Nathan A Stark | Blackduck, MN 56630 | $4,802 |
88 | Aaron R Anderson | Becker, MN 55308 | $4,639 |
89 | Stuart Nelson | Princeton, MN 55371 | $4,553 |
90 | Donald L Johnson | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $4,438 |
91 | Harold F Schroeder | Becker, MN 55308 | $4,350 |
92 | David B Pearson | Buffalo, MN 55313 | $4,293 |
93 | Roger John Nelson | Princeton, MN 55371 | $4,194 |
94 | Dennis M Jannusch | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $4,159 |
95 | Robert Wedlin Kasowski | Karlsruhe, ND 58744 | $4,158 |
96 | Frank Joseph Kasowski III | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $4,158 |
97 | Brent D Gilyard | Oak Park, MN 56357 | $4,018 |
98 | William C Knutson | Princeton, MN 55371 | $3,944 |
99 | Randy R Zeroth | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $3,908 |
100 | John Plaisted | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $3,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”