Total Disaster Programs in Sherburne County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 214
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sherburne County, Minnesota totaled $5,252,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Waldon R Anderson | Becker, MN 55308 | $254,344 |
2 | Elk River Greenhouse LLC | Elk River, MN 55330 | $224,948 |
3 | Robert Waldon John Anderson | Becker, MN 55308 | $217,732 |
4 | Travis D Brambrink | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $170,089 |
5 | T J Farms Ltd | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $160,000 |
6 | Elk River Greenhouse & Vegetable | Elk River, MN 55330 | $159,256 |
7 | Toth Farms Inc | Elk River, MN 55330 | $147,615 |
8 | Donald W Brambrink | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $129,580 |
9 | , | $125,000 | |
10 | Five Star Potato | Becker, MN 55308 | $106,697 |
11 | John J Urwin | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $103,374 |
12 | Eilers Bros. Limited Partnership | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $101,366 |
13 | John N Weis | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $96,924 |
14 | Kermit L Gilyard | Princeton, MN 55371 | $95,136 |
15 | Dorothy K Beck Dba Elk River Gree | Elk River, MN 55330 | $94,127 |
16 | Timothy P Hurrle | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $93,282 |
17 | Thomas W Knutson | Becker, MN 55308 | $89,769 |
18 | Gregory Robert Sumser | Princeton, MN 55371 | $88,812 |
19 | Compart's Boar Store Of Princeton Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $85,300 |
20 | Eric F Anderson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $82,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>