Production Flexibility Program in Sherburne County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 416
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Sherburne County, Minnesota totaled $6,462,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry B Urwin | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $80,296 |
22 | Virgil E Gilyard | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $72,629 |
23 | Ewing Farms Inc | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $68,270 |
24 | O'neil J Person | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $68,197 |
25 | Kiffmeyer Farms Inc | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $64,896 |
26 | Hok Farms Inc | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $64,042 |
27 | Kelly Kreger | Elk River, MN 55330 | $63,438 |
28 | Peterson Farms | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $62,787 |
29 | Hok Farms | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $60,533 |
30 | Kelly V Boettcher | Princeton, MN 55371 | $56,915 |
31 | Rodney Alan Kozak | Saint Cloud, MN 56304 | $56,447 |
32 | Kiffmeyer Dairy Farms | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $55,702 |
33 | Mal Loren Goenner | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $55,420 |
34 | James Steven Hartkopf | Walker, MN 56484 | $55,109 |
35 | Mary B Imholte | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $54,183 |
36 | Steven Clarence Kiffmeyer | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $50,818 |
37 | Clear Valley Farms LLC | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $48,536 |
38 | Truman Pete Sanford And Sons Inc | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $45,543 |
39 | Michael J Kiffmeyer | Clear Lake, MN 55319 | $45,012 |
40 | Del Hayes & Sons Inc | Big Lake, MN 55309 | $42,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”