Market Loss Assistance Program in Stevens County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 713
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Stevens County, Minnesota totaled $17,481,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lazy Q Farms Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $99,000 |
22 | Schaefer Bros Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $98,392 |
23 | Mark Holslin | Alberta, MN 56207 | $97,277 |
24 | Jerry Jost | Morris, MN 56267 | $96,807 |
25 | Kannegiesser Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $95,911 |
26 | Tonn Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $95,741 |
27 | Royce Anderson | Hancock, MN 56244 | $94,928 |
28 | Bradley & Kristi Fehr Living Trus | Morris, MN 56267 | $94,260 |
29 | Aldean M Luthi | Hancock, MN 56244 | $93,596 |
30 | Michael Fitzgerald | The Villages, FL 32163 | $93,336 |
31 | J & D Hog Farms Inc | Alberta, MN 56207 | $92,185 |
32 | Keith Wilts | Chokio, MN 56221 | $91,921 |
33 | Michael J Asmus | Chokio, MN 56221 | $91,766 |
34 | Rohloff Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $91,056 |
35 | Four K Farms Ptshp | Hancock, MN 56244 | $89,123 |
36 | Gary & Sandra Fehr Living Trust | Morris, MN 56267 | $88,373 |
37 | Tubbs Ag Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $87,087 |
38 | Dennis E Wernsing | Chokio, MN 56221 | $85,882 |
39 | Norman Beyer Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $85,525 |
40 | Schaefer Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $85,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”