Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Swift County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 136
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Swift County, Minnesota totaled $411,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James M Payne | Benson, MN 56215 | $1,291 |
62 | Robert W Doyle | Danvers, MN 56231 | $1,286 |
63 | Michael Allen Soper | Milan, MN 56262 | $1,221 |
64 | Tammy- Trust Agmt Of Tammy Ascheman Ascheman | Benson, MN 56215 | $1,215 |
65 | Tom Razink | Clontarf, MN 56226 | $1,181 |
66 | Larry C Thompson | Murdock, MN 56271 | $1,177 |
67 | Daren C Schuerman | Danvers, MN 56231 | $1,168 |
68 | Jerome B Bailey | Benson, MN 56215 | $1,095 |
69 | Pamela Stegeman | Goodland, KS 67735 | $1,087 |
70 | Christopher Gallagher | Murdock, MN 56271 | $1,071 |
71 | Leroy Froehlich | Murdock, MN 56271 | $1,048 |
72 | David A Schmidt | Appleton, MN 56208 | $1,031 |
73 | Jonathan William Broberg | Kerkhoven, MN 56252 | $1,020 |
74 | Trager Bros Of Appleton Inc | Appleton, MN 56208 | $1,018 |
75 | Jonathan D Klucas | Clontarf, MN 56226 | $1,018 |
76 | Robert J Mcgeary | Danvers, MN 56231 | $1,008 |
77 | Jon Svingen | Benson, MN 56215 | $1,002 |
78 | Joey Schreck | Appleton, MN 56208 | $1,000 |
79 | Alexandra Louise Bouta | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $987 |
80 | Jordan Devin Schuerman | Danvers, MN 56231 | $986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”