Total Conservation Programs in Traverse County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 628
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Traverse County, Minnesota totaled $3,877,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Shannon Boehmlehner | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $13,336 |
82 | Cathy Lundquist | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $13,333 |
83 | Adeline & Timothy Zentgraf Irrevocable Trust | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $13,237 |
84 | Norma Holtz | Tintah, MN 56583 | $13,205 |
85 | Dean Holtz | Tintah, MN 56583 | $13,205 |
86 | The Miller Group | Wahpeton, ND 58074 | $13,056 |
87 | Aaron Deal Farms Inc | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $13,023 |
88 | Larry Rose | Roseau, MN 56751 | $12,970 |
89 | Michael Peyton | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $12,896 |
90 | Roger Abraham | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $12,760 |
91 | Jacob Thomas Rinke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $12,460 |
92 | Angela Rud | Waconia, MN 55387 | $12,307 |
93 | Progressive Farms LLC | Tintah, MN 56583 | $12,206 |
94 | Mavis Edelle Magnuson | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $12,165 |
95 | Virginia L Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $11,979 |
96 | Roger A Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $11,979 |
97 | Sandra B Conroy | Dumont, MN 56236 | $11,918 |
98 | River Bend Ag Partnership | Tintah, MN 56583 | $11,830 |
99 | Fred G Schmidtke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $11,705 |
100 | Virginia L Schmidtke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $11,705 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”