Farm Subsidy information
Traverse County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Traverse County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,244
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Traverse County, Minnesota totaled $476,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Raguse Farms | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,534,718 |
2 | Jon Mathias | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,485,028 |
3 | Craig S Lichtsinn | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,476,699 |
4 | Landes High Prairie Farm Inc | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,355,788 |
5 | Marihart Farms Inc | Dumont, MN 56236 | $2,282,302 |
6 | Alan Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $2,265,525 |
7 | Raguse Family Partnership | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,084,704 |
8 | Curtis Braun | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,080,707 |
9 | Hasbargen Farming Partnership | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,060,027 |
10 | Stueve Farms Inc | Dumont, MN 56236 | $1,996,582 |
11 | Wm Schmidt Farms Inc | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $1,941,634 |
12 | Janine Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $1,934,116 |
13 | Gsd Farms Llp | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $1,876,618 |
14 | Conroy Farms Inc | Dumont, MN 56236 | $1,851,101 |
15 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $1,847,871 |
16 | Alan F Behrens | Dumont, MN 56236 | $1,843,252 |
17 | Gary Dean Behrens | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $1,811,280 |
18 | Behrens Farms Inc | Dumont, MN 56236 | $1,792,880 |
19 | Rinke Ag Inc | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $1,788,897 |
20 | Christine Kaye Morgan | Tintah, MN 56583 | $1,743,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>