Total Conservation Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 452
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,104,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank Gerard Galler | Elysian, MN 56028 | $20,725 |
22 | Gwen Marie Wheelock | Janesville, MN 56048 | $20,014 |
23 | Jeffery Todd Meyer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $19,059 |
24 | , | $18,986 | |
25 | David Michael Krampitz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $18,906 |
26 | Maynard A Breck | Waseca, MN 56093 | $17,635 |
27 | Jonathan J Wenzel | New Richland, MN 56072 | $16,768 |
28 | Gary Gottschalk | Janesville, MN 56048 | $16,674 |
29 | Merlyn Robert Proechel | Waseca, MN 56093 | $15,861 |
30 | David John Winegar | Waseca, MN 56093 | $14,525 |
31 | Suzanne Klukas | Waseca, MN 56093 | $14,418 |
32 | Gary D Worke | Waseca, MN 56093 | $14,158 |
33 | Richard Lee Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $14,112 |
34 | Donald E Huebl | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,982 |
35 | David Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $12,874 |
36 | Patrick G Gregor | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,794 |
37 | Delbert W Ziemke | Janesville, MN 56048 | $12,458 |
38 | Patricia Mariska | Waterville, MN 56096 | $12,325 |
39 | Darrell Peterson | Waterville, MN 56096 | $11,149 |
40 | Clayton E Stangler Residuary Trus | Waterville, MN 56096 | $11,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”