Oilseed Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 628
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,257,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lyle Leroy Kuhns | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,949 |
42 | Warren Peter Enevoldsen | Rio Verde, AZ 85263 | $9,936 |
43 | Dale Curtis Ewert | Janesville, MN 56048 | $9,916 |
44 | James C Possin | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,868 |
45 | Dale Ronald Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,795 |
46 | Dennis Lee Hanson | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $9,694 |
47 | Duwayne Cletus Hoehn | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,536 |
48 | Terry Dean Hansen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,438 |
49 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $9,364 |
50 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,355 |
51 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,350 |
52 | Donald Arthur Huebl | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,298 |
53 | Marlin A Kreutz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,117 |
54 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $9,011 |
55 | Glen Frederick Bethke Jr | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,010 |
56 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $8,936 |
57 | Roger Joseph Androli | Janesville, MN 56048 | $8,883 |
58 | Dean Alan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $8,663 |
59 | Richard Hoehn | Janesville, MN 56048 | $8,637 |
60 | Allen Lyle Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $8,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”