Counter Cyclical Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 676
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $9,537,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scott Warren Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $45,677 |
42 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $44,897 |
43 | Gregg Allen Rollins | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $44,074 |
44 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $44,028 |
45 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $42,148 |
46 | David Wayne Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $42,078 |
47 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $41,771 |
48 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $40,693 |
49 | Kmb Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $40,437 |
50 | Warren Peter Enevoldsen | Rio Verde, AZ 85263 | $40,383 |
51 | James Charles Grubish | Waterville, MN 56096 | $40,161 |
52 | William Loren Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $39,392 |
53 | Randy Carl Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $39,392 |
54 | Jeffrey Orville Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $38,858 |
55 | Mark Francis Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $38,622 |
56 | Gregory Dean Moe | New Richland, MN 56072 | $38,447 |
57 | Bernard Frederick & Roger Frederi | Waseca, MN 56093 | $38,032 |
58 | Bradley Eugene Spinler | Morristown, MN 55052 | $37,861 |
59 | Frank Gerard Galler | Elysian, MN 56028 | $37,608 |
60 | Bill Ernest Roemhildt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $37,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”