Counter Cyclical Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 676
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $9,537,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lynn Arthur Below | Waseca, MN 56093 | $37,145 |
62 | Melvin Robert Reineke | Morristown, MN 55052 | $36,442 |
63 | John Robert Guse | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $36,388 |
64 | Timothy John Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $36,049 |
65 | Marvin Gene Guse | Janesville, MN 56048 | $35,652 |
66 | Burke Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $34,826 |
67 | Keith George Morgan | Janesville, MN 56048 | $34,705 |
68 | David Ervin Born | Waseca, MN 56093 | $34,612 |
69 | Rlp Enterprises Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $34,327 |
70 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $33,950 |
71 | Geoffrey Paul Jessen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $33,838 |
72 | Michael Laurence Supalla | New Richland, MN 56072 | $33,641 |
73 | Allen Wayne Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $33,515 |
74 | Clarence L Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $33,178 |
75 | Neil Warren Roesler | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $32,872 |
76 | Gene Terry Roesler | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $32,872 |
77 | Leonard Paul Marquardt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $32,670 |
78 | Jason Gene Witt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $32,533 |
79 | Richard Lee Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $32,529 |
80 | Harlan Alfred Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $32,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”