Direct Payment Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 881
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $48,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Loren Leslie Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $175,267 |
62 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $171,141 |
63 | Malterer Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $170,373 |
64 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $169,779 |
65 | James William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $169,521 |
66 | Jon Michael Schuch | Janesville, MN 56048 | $168,856 |
67 | Richard Lee Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $167,214 |
68 | Jason Gene Witt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $165,930 |
69 | Richard Vern Possin | New Richland, MN 56072 | $165,336 |
70 | Curtis Craig Collins | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $165,037 |
71 | Dennis Merlin Roesler | New Richland, MN 56072 | $163,253 |
72 | Scott Warren Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $162,535 |
73 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $162,470 |
74 | Timothy James Lewer | New Richland, MN 56072 | $160,040 |
75 | David Howard Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $159,797 |
76 | Neil Warren Roesler | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $159,773 |
77 | Gene Terry Roesler | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $159,773 |
78 | K & K Farms Of Waseca | Waterville, MN 56096 | $157,425 |
79 | Mark Francis Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $156,629 |
80 | Todd William Traynor | Janesville, MN 56048 | $156,582 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”