Total Disaster Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 459
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $5,776,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael Joseph Schuch | Janesville, MN 56048 | $17,629 |
82 | Ben M Sutter | Morristown, MN 55052 | $17,463 |
83 | Kevin L O'connor | Faribault, MN 55021 | $16,961 |
84 | Michael Laurence Supalla | New Richland, MN 56072 | $16,916 |
85 | Dale Curtis Ewert | Janesville, MN 56048 | $16,877 |
86 | Curtis Russell | New Richland, MN 56072 | $16,672 |
87 | Bruce J Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $16,637 |
88 | Allen Wayne Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $16,498 |
89 | Ronald Todd Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $15,807 |
90 | Larry Huber | Waseca, MN 56093 | $15,806 |
91 | Timothy Paul Ignaszewski | New Richland, MN 56072 | $15,269 |
92 | Kevin Lawrence Chicos | New Richland, MN 56072 | $15,096 |
93 | Paul Robert Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $15,087 |
94 | Gene Terry Roesler | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $14,875 |
95 | Terrance Charles Traynor | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $14,826 |
96 | Thomas J Marzinske | Janesville, MN 56048 | $14,793 |
97 | Neil Warren Roesler | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $14,766 |
98 | Dean Alan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $13,985 |
99 | Thomas John Traynor | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $13,634 |
100 | Chad Michael Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $13,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”