Loan Deficiency in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 816
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $31,709,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kmb Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $101,653 |
82 | Paul A Anderson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $101,294 |
83 | Odean V Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $100,007 |
84 | Tamra Jean Hildebrandt/haley | Waseca, MN 56093 | $99,636 |
85 | Zimmerman Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $99,472 |
86 | Clarence L Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $99,446 |
87 | Dale Robert Huelsnitz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $98,980 |
88 | David Eddie Swenson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $97,951 |
89 | Dean Alan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $97,433 |
90 | Davison Farms | Waterville, MN 56096 | $97,235 |
91 | Leo John Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $97,120 |
92 | Malterer Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $96,623 |
93 | Don William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $96,388 |
94 | Edward George Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $96,281 |
95 | James Robert Mulcahey | Janesville, MN 56048 | $96,230 |
96 | Richard Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $95,877 |
97 | John Robert Guse | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $94,773 |
98 | Roger Mark Haley | Waseca, MN 56093 | $94,588 |
99 | Dennis Lee Hanson | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $94,201 |
100 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $93,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”