Conservation Reserve Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 440
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $1,915,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael J Galler | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $5,141 |
102 | Dale Lorenz Hoffman | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,041 |
103 | Leon Ellis Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,913 |
104 | Eaton Bros Farms LLC | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,900 |
105 | Eldo W Guse And Luann M Guse Revocable Trust | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,871 |
106 | Leann Marie Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,781 |
107 | Richard Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,741 |
108 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,652 |
109 | David Darrol Sponberg | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,629 |
110 | John R Kramer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,582 |
111 | Karla Sue Christopherson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,574 |
112 | Duane Gehring | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $4,473 |
113 | Lonny H Klemmensen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,444 |
114 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,390 |
115 | Paul A Anderson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,378 |
116 | Jon Tom & Dave Trahms Farm Partne | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,370 |
117 | Randy Bartz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,368 |
118 | Bradley Keith Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,364 |
119 | Lyle Vaughan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,325 |
120 | Waseca Sportsmen Club | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”