Total Disaster Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 459
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $5,776,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Troy Nathan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $13,469 |
102 | George W Byron | New Richland, MN 56072 | $13,274 |
103 | Gary L Bartosch | Medford, MN 55049 | $13,048 |
104 | Gary Gordon Bartelt | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $13,028 |
105 | Clint Lester Sevcik | Faribault, MN 55021 | $12,642 |
106 | Richard Joseph Androli | Janesville, MN 56048 | $12,447 |
107 | Ronald Norman Miller | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $12,264 |
108 | Casey Joe Roeker | New Richland, MN 56072 | $12,045 |
109 | Joel Frank Weber | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,000 |
110 | Matthew Groskreutz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,887 |
111 | Margaret Mary Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,869 |
112 | Doris Kay Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,858 |
113 | John Elmer Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,858 |
114 | Maxwell Louis Fox | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,829 |
115 | Barry Lee Bartelt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,654 |
116 | Roger Donald Witts | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $11,557 |
117 | Malterer Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $11,344 |
118 | John P Volz | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $11,200 |
119 | Ivan Francis Maas | Janesville, MN 56048 | $11,132 |
120 | Laurence Jeffrey Ruedy | Waseca, MN 56093 | $10,916 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”