Conservation Reserve Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 434
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,071,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Leann Marie Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,781 |
122 | Richard Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,741 |
123 | , | $4,677 | |
124 | Lonny H Klemmensen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,646 |
125 | Andrew Steven Dimmel | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,577 |
126 | Mn Ag Interpretive Center | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,532 |
127 | Duane Gehring | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $4,473 |
128 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $4,470 |
129 | , | $4,428 | |
130 | Jon Tom & Dave Trahms Farm Partne | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,370 |
131 | Bradley Keith Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,364 |
132 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,349 |
133 | Lori -lori L. Pommerenke Revocable Trust L. Pommer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,340 |
134 | Waseca Sportsmen Club | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,306 |
135 | , | $4,277 | |
136 | Agreement Of Dale Piltingsrud Rev Trust | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,125 |
137 | Florence A Braun | Morristown, MN 55052 | $4,122 |
138 | Margaret Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,074 |
139 | Paul A Anderson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,073 |
140 | Mark Lee Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”