Loan Deficiency in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 816
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $31,709,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gregory Paul Jewison | Janesville, MN 56048 | $82,855 |
122 | Ronald Coy | New Richland, MN 56072 | $82,459 |
123 | Jeffrey Mark Kunz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $81,295 |
124 | Curtis Craig Collins | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $80,502 |
125 | Ronald Joseph Schuch | Janesville, MN 56048 | $79,964 |
126 | Harlan Alfred Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $79,233 |
127 | Kipp D Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $79,121 |
128 | Robert Burns | Janesville, MN 56048 | $79,036 |
129 | Richard Vincent Chicos | New Richland, MN 56072 | $77,317 |
130 | Gary William Budach | New Richland, MN 56072 | $76,515 |
131 | Michael Clifford Weydert | New Richland, MN 56072 | $76,285 |
132 | Eugene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $75,886 |
133 | Dean Alan Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $75,882 |
134 | Emerald Acres Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $75,000 |
135 | Brian David Mittelstaedt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $74,466 |
136 | Lane Alan Wacholz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $73,415 |
137 | David Wayne Kuhns | Waseca, MN 56093 | $73,193 |
138 | Warren Scott Johnson | Wells, MN 56097 | $73,071 |
139 | Charles D Johnson | Wells, MN 56097 | $73,071 |
140 | Jeffrey Joseph Androli | Janesville, MN 56048 | $72,126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”