Loan Deficiency in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 816
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $31,709,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Herbert Guse | Janesville, MN 56048 | $71,891 |
142 | Bruce Alfred Risto | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $70,635 |
143 | Layne Leroy Janike | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $69,177 |
144 | Scott Gregg Singlestad | Waseca, MN 56093 | $69,043 |
145 | David Ervin Born | Waseca, MN 56093 | $68,932 |
146 | David Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $68,747 |
147 | Melvin F Meyer | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $68,546 |
148 | Bruce Allan Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $68,234 |
149 | Leroy Bernard Stenzel | New Richland, MN 56072 | $67,934 |
150 | Fair Acres Stock Farm Inc | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $67,861 |
151 | Harold D Krienke | Janesville, MN 56048 | $67,573 |
152 | Keith John Eustice | Waseca, MN 56093 | $67,444 |
153 | Mark F Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $66,475 |
154 | Randall Orlin Lewer | New Richland, MN 56072 | $66,332 |
155 | Joseph D Jewison | Janesville, MN 56048 | $66,102 |
156 | David Harold Jacobson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $65,997 |
157 | Bradley Edward Krause | Janesville, MN 56048 | $65,326 |
158 | Kenneth William Eaton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $65,094 |
159 | Lee William Born | Janesville, MN 56048 | $65,069 |
160 | Carl Dobberstein | New Richland, MN 56072 | $64,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”