Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 711
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $352,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Vincent Chicos | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,013 |
22 | Jason Gene Witt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $5,012 |
23 | Richard Joseph Androli | Janesville, MN 56048 | $5,009 |
24 | John Elmer Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,009 |
25 | Roger Mark Haley | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,004 |
26 | Lester Trahms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $5,001 |
27 | Donald Hoehn | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,000 |
28 | Daryl Erdman | Elysian, MN 56028 | $5,000 |
29 | Garry Walstrom | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,000 |
30 | Gregg Allen Rollins | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $4,891 |
31 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $4,467 |
32 | Roger Joseph Androli | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,441 |
33 | Michael J Galler | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $4,307 |
34 | Frank Gerard Galler | Elysian, MN 56028 | $4,307 |
35 | Dolores P Miller | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,253 |
36 | Don William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $4,149 |
37 | David Wayne Kuhns | Waseca, MN 56093 | $3,823 |
38 | Jerry David Proehl Dba Jd Proehl Family Farms | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $3,700 |
39 | Lyle E Kahnke Estate | Mendota Heights, MN 55118 | $3,655 |
40 | Curtis Carl Proehl | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $3,619 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”