Oilseed Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 628
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,257,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darrol Sponberg | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,678 |
22 | Ben M Sutter | Morristown, MN 55052 | $11,530 |
23 | Thomas John Traynor | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $11,355 |
24 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,340 |
25 | Keith D Remund | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,287 |
26 | Melvin Robert Reineke | Morristown, MN 55052 | $11,196 |
27 | Davison Farms | Waterville, MN 56096 | $11,168 |
28 | Jeffrey Mark Kunz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,036 |
29 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,900 |
30 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $10,877 |
31 | John Elmer Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $10,789 |
32 | David Ervin Born | Waseca, MN 56093 | $10,736 |
33 | David Wayne Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $10,735 |
34 | Charles Steven Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,728 |
35 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,728 |
36 | James Charles Grubish | Waterville, MN 56096 | $10,635 |
37 | Michael Clifford Weydert | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,329 |
38 | Ronald Todd Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $10,184 |
39 | Ivan Francis Maas | Janesville, MN 56048 | $10,109 |
40 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $9,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”